Friday, August 31, 2007

Big Wins Continued

After all the excitement in the preceding few weeks, it seems as if the streak of high-scoring hands was continuing, as there were two big wins in the 25th August session. Still, there were no major changes to the rankings, as everyone remains firmly in their positions. While JT obtained 6 table points from two games to advance her position, EP also took 6 table points to stay tantalisingly ahead!

Current Standings (current as of 25 Aug 2007)
Player NameTable PointsContest PointsGames Played
EP41+158516
JT36.5+145115
AJ15-69912
WJ14-117912
KP9-85
AW3.5-5805
EL0-5703


Session Report for 25 August 2007

The first game was full of interesting starting hands. For EP, these most unlikely hands turned into winning ones. From many unpromising-looking hands, he managed to fashion several winning hands to win the first game. AJ was most unfortunate, for not only did she almost not win any hand, she discarded the winning tiles six times, four of which went to EP, letting EP amass so many contest points!

One of the more interesting hands won by EP happened early in Game 1. He was basically attempting to make an All Fives hand, but it seemed that hand was going to end in a draw. On the very last tile, WJ discarded a 2d (2 Dot) which appeared to be a safe discard, especially since it was the last 2d. EP took one look and quickly claimed it for a Last Tile Claim win coupled to a Last Tile. Together with a few other fan, it turned out to be a sizeable 19-point hand! No All Fives, but still a good win!



The lesson: the last tile discard is always a potential winning tile for ready hands, since the Last Tile Claim fan has enough points for any ready hand to win, whatever the composition of that hand. So, it would be best to scrutinise the discards to see which tile is really safe. In this case, 2d was not truly safe. Although there were three 2d tiles already discarded, the tiles adjacent to 2d were not all discarded, meaning that there were players still holding onto nearby dot tiles (most probably as sequences). EP did and indeed won with the 2d, which completed a sequence of 2d-3d-4d.

Besides interesting starting hands, the kinds of hands won were also interesting to observe. For example, there was a string of Lower Four hands won by three different players. There was also a string of Pure Straight hands, but this is not as surprising as the players are all rather oriented towards chow-based hands.


The second game started out well for WJ, who won three of the first five hands. The sixth hand, South 2, was a turning-point, for JT. JT had received a very good starting hand.



The fan was obvious: go for Triple Pung of the nines, and All Terminals and Honours was also possible. However, the hand was very drawn-out. JT managed to draw a GD, and melded that when one was discarded. Almost to the end of the hand, she had not managed to meld any other sets, but she was actually ready. On JT's right was WJ, striving to make a Melded Hand. She had come to a point when she was ready, with a single concealed tile, with the rest melded on the table. When she had to discard one of the two tiles after drawing, she decided to discard the 9d as she figured she had more chance of winning with the other tile. 9d had not been discarded at all, so she figured someone else was keeping all the others (which was true). JT melded the 9d for a melded kong, then drew a replacement tile, which turned out to be a winning tile for her. The results: All Terminals and Honours, Triple Pung, Out with Replacement Tile and a few others for a total of 64 points. It was heavy damage, considering this was a self-drawn win. With this, JT overtook everyone else comfortably by collecting 216 points, and she maintained the lead all the way to the end of the game.



For this hand, WJ's Melded Hand basically left her with little defensive alternatives. As JT's hand was mainly concealed, it was hard to predict the dangerous tiles to discard, although the lack of discards of the nines was a good clue. Discarding a terminal tile so late in the hand was therefore very dangerous! WJ admitted she did not read the discards carefully, and it was a painful lesson for her, since she was in the lead initially. If JT had directly won with the 9d discard, she still would not have made such a big gain, but it turned out to be an Out with Replacement Tile win instead.

As a consolation, WJ managed to win with a hand including an All Terminals and Honours fan, worth a total of 38 points, in the very last hand (North 4), but was not able to get enough points to get 2nd place. WJ at least managed to take back 2 table points for this session, while AJ had none at all!

Results of Game 1, 25 August 2007
Player NameTable PointsContest PointsWins (SD)Discards
EP4+3319 (2)2
JT2+1094 (2)1
WJ1-1532 (0)3
AJ0-2871 (0)6


Results of Game 2, 25 August 2007
Player NameTable PointsContest PointsWins (SD)Discards
JT4+1914 (2)4
EP2+685 (1)2
WJ1-675 (0)4
AJ0-1922 (0)3

Friday, August 24, 2007

Big Wins Galore!

Everyone seems to be doing well at the mahjong table recently, more or less. JT obtained her highest ever score in a single game, +567 points, although EP holds the group record of +596. We have also seen a few high scoring hands (details below). With such interesting hands, some discussion about strategy had surfaced, and we all learnt more as we played.

Current Standings (current as of 18 Aug 2007)
Player NameTable PointsContest PointsGames Played
EP35+118614
JT30.5+115113
AJ15-22010
WJ12-95910
KP9-85
AW3.5-5805
EL0-5703


Session Report for 04 August 2007

It has been a while since KP and AW played. With KP and AW, the overall game strategy changes. There are usually very few chow-based hands due to KP's playing style (he favours pung-based and semi-pure hands). With pungs happening everywhere, chow-based hands get affected, and players (especially players who favour chow-based hands like JT) are sometimes forced to abandon such hands.

In fact, for this game, there were fewer chow-based winning hands compared to other occasions. There were only four hands with All Chows, and none with Mixed Triple Chows or Mixed Shifted Chows, although there were five hands with Pure Straight, one Pure Shifted Chows and one Mixed Straight. The fact that there are chow-based hands not in combination with All Chows showed that pungs were made very often to complete hands.

KP was rather unlucky in this game as he did not win many hands. He was also Robbed of a Win in one hand, because JT happened to be sitting above him. JT herself was Robbed by EP in a later hand. Such was the turn of fortune.

Early in the game, AW managed to make a beautiful hand, consisting of Three Concealed Pungs, Mixed Shifted Pungs, All Pungs, All Simples, Concealed Hand and a Double Pung, worth a total of 36 points. Had AW drawn the winning tile herself, she would have gotten Four Concealed Pungs. Because of her wait, her hand was potentially worth a Triple Pung (instead of the Mixed Shifted Pungs).

Just a couple of hands later, EP managed to win with an All Terminals and Honours hand, courtesy of JT's discard. EP had melded pungs of 1D, WW and EW when JT discarded a WD (rather uneasily, seeing EP's threatening melds on the table). AW soon followed with a discard of WD, and then she threw out NW, which EP prompted melded. So, on the table, there was four melded pungs indicating a possible All Terminals and Honours hand, as well as a possible Melded Hand. Unluckily for JT, she thought WD was safe because there were already two discards on the table, so she discarded WD, only for EP to win with that very discard. The crucial point was the melding of NW which made EP's hand ready with a single wait (a cunning or desperate WD, depending on your viewpoint), which JT did not realise. Sadly for EP, the hand was undervalued because he forgot to count in Big Three Winds. Nonetheless, he made enough points to obtain 4 table points for this game.

Results of Game 1, 04 August 2007
Player NameTable PointsContest PointsWins (SD)Discards
EP4+2105 (2)3
AW2-243 (1)1
JT1-534 (2)3
KP0-1332 (1)1


Session Report for 18 August 2007

This was an exciting session, where many high-scoring hands were attempted, and several hands were drawn-out affairs, almost ending in draws. Ultimately, JT emerged most triumphant, with an emphatic win of +567 points in Game 1. Although she did not do as well in Game 2, the results of Game 2 is not consequential as it was incomplete, with only 12 hands played due to lack of time.

Interestingly, this session also saw many self-drawn wins — 14 hands out of a total of 27 winning hands were self-drawn! JT made 5 self-drawn wins out of a total of 8 wins in Game 1 alone, which contributed greatly to her high score. The other players were simply no match for her in Game 1. In Game 2, all the hands in the entire West round were won with self-drawn tiles (two each by EP and JT).

Now, to the high-scoring hands made in this session. The first was made by JT in the middle of the West round. By this point in time, JT was already leading with +282 points to the second-placed EP's +31. JT managed to self-draw a winning tile to obtain Four Pure Shifted Pungs with Full Flush and a few other small fan to win some 255 points from the rest of the players, putting her in an unstoppable lead!

The second high-scoring hand was made by WJ in Game 2. Earlier in Game 1, WJ had a potential Little Three Dragons, having two tiles each of RD and GD. For some reason, she discarded WD when she drew it, even though no dragons had been discarded at this time. So, later, WJ melded RD. EP then gave her the GD, as there was already no danger that she would win with a Little Three Dragons since she discarded the WD herself. Unfortunately for WJ, she drew WD again, and saw the wasted Little Three Dragons. The consensus during the discussion after the hand was that WD should have been kept in hand, since no dragons had been discarded yet, meaning there was a good chance of completing a Three Dragons fan, Big or Little.

Well, WJ had a second chance in Game 2! Again, she got a starting hand with two pairs of dragons. She had a complete triplet of RD and she melded a kong with it. Up to this point, there was no other indication that she was attempting another Three Dragons fan, although there were no other dragons discarded at all. WJ continued to meld a WW and then a bamboo sequence. After some time, WJ managed to self-draw a WD to complete a Little Three Dragons! Having missed one earlier, WJ refused to let go of her single WD this time round (she had a concealed triplet of GD). This winning hand was worth some 79 points for the basic score, and she jumped into the lead with the 261 points she collected from the other players.

Unfortunately, the next few hands saw her lose ground, and she dropped to second place overall. It is a pity this game was not completed and thus did not count towards the group rankings. All in all, there was plenty of excitement and fun this session. Big wins sure are fun!

Results of Game 1, 18 August 2007
Player NameTable PointsContest PointsWins (SD)Discards
JT4+5678 (5)1
EP2-1373 (1)3
AJ1-1613 (2)3
WJ0-2691 (0)0


Results of Game 2, 18 August 2007
Player NameTable PointsContest PointsWins (SD)Discards
EP(4)+1675 (2)0
WJ(2)+1413 (2)3
JT(1)-1083 (2)2
AJ(0)-2001 (0)1

Wednesday, August 08, 2007

Terminology Troubles

Reach Mahjong Columns' Garthe was writing about the Japanese mahjong hand pinfu (平和 Mandarin pínghé, usually pronounced pínghú, at least here in Singapore) when the use of the term Peace was questioned by Tina Christensen of Mahjong Denmark. The Chinese term 平和 means "peace" but few people would think of it as peace literally. Tina's comment basically released an avalanche of opinions regarding the creation and use of new (but non-standard) terms in English. It also prompted this blog entry about terminology.

Mahjong terminology has always been a thorny issue for mahjong players, new or veteran. Most casual players really just want to play mahjong and not care about whether the terms they use are accurate, or what they really mean.

For experienced players teaching new players mahjong, which terminology should they use? If the new player does not have any background in Chinese (Mandarin, Cantonese or other major dialects) or Japanese, does it make sense to use terminology of Chinese/Japanese origin?

The good folks at Reach Mahjong Columns have taken the approach of using new English terms as substitutes for the original Sino-Japanese and Japanese terminology. An example would be bump instead of pung (碰 Mandarin pèng, Japanese pon).

Now, pung (like chow and kong) are considered standard mahjong terms in English. Standard in the sense that many mahjong books published have used these spellings (for example, Millington's The Complete Book of Mah-Jongg, 1977), and these terms should be quite familiar to most mahjong players all over the world. Also, these 'standard' terms still bear resemblance to their Asian counterparts, and when playing with Asian mahjong players, there would be little confusion over the use of these terms during actual play.

However, are new terms like bump a good idea? It is hard to say. On one hand, new players may find it easier to learn the game without having to learn new terms in a different language. On the other hand, once these new terms are learnt, players may be resistant to unlearn them and learn the 'correct' original terms. This poses the problem of communicability in a globalised environment. It is no longer so difficult to find websites about obscure topics. Websites about different variants of mahjong are now available. If all sorts of different terms are invented for common concepts in mahjong, will there be confusion where none should exist in the first place?

Friday, August 03, 2007

Rankings Update

Results at the mahjong table have been a little unpredictable of late. Despite JT's open declaration to overtake EP in the rankings, she has been unable to replicate her previous form and win enough table points to beat EP and take top spot. On the other hand, WJ, who has been doing poorly of late, managed to win the last two games to climb up to fourth place.

Current Standings (current as of 28 Jul 2007)
Player NameTable PointsContest PointsGames Played
EP29+111312
JT25.5+63711
AJ14-599
WJ12-6909
KP9+1254
AW1.5-5564
EL0-5703


Session Report for 28 July 2007
The first game was a close fight. The players all seemed to be evenly-matched, with no one getting a clear lead on the rest. In the beginning of the 4th round, it seems as if EP was going to win the game, as he had a 79 point lead on the second-placed WJ. However, WJ managed to surge to the top by taking the last three hands.

AJ, who did rather poorly in the first game, led most of the way in the second game, with a very strong lead of 266 points by the middle of the 3rd round. WJ managed to win three of the next five hands to overtake AJ, to obtain her second 1st placing for the day! EL had replaced EP for the second game and did not do very well, not managing to win a single hand.

Results of Game 1, 28 July 2007
Player NameTable PointsContest PointsWins (SD)Discards
WJ4+1296 (1)0
EP2+484 (2)5
JT1-554 (0)2
AJ0-1221 (1)4


Results of Game 2, 28 July 2007
Player NameTable PointsContest PointsWins (SD)Discards
WJ4+1345 (1)5
AJ2+1036 (1)3
JT1-374 (0)3
EL0-2000 (0)1